Learning Collective Dynamics & Interacting Particle Systems
How can hidden interaction mechanisms be inferred from collective behavior when observations, interaction structure, or physical laws are only partially known?
My work in collective dynamics studies both the forward and inverse relationship between microscopic interactions and emergent macroscopic behavior. Earlier work on swarmalators examined how competing attractive and repulsive interactions generate distinct collective states through modeling and analysis. This naturally motivates the inverse question: what can observed collective behavior reveal about the interactions that produced it?
Classical interaction-learning methods typically assume sufficiently rich trajectory data and a prescribed interaction architecture. My current work explores what remains identifiable in more ill-posed settings, including inference from highly limited observations, unknown interaction neighborhoods, and observational data for which even the governing physical law is not supplied beforehand.

Learning from Limited Observations
We study how interaction kernels can be recovered when only collective steady states are observed. Such data make system identification highly degenerate, and we show that identifiability is governed by the distribution of observed configurations together with the structural information encoded in the patterns themselves.
Learning Interaction Topology
We develop methods that ask not only how agents interact, but also who interacts with whom. This includes metric, nearest-neighbor, Voronoi, density-dependent interaction rules, etc., with the goal of identifying interaction structure and interaction kernels jointly.
Discovering Gravitational Structure
Using Solar-System ephemerides as a testbed, we study whether interpretable physical laws can emerge directly from trajectory observations without imposing the governing law beforehand, including source-dependent interactions and missing-source inference.



